Journal Search Engine
Download PDF Export Citation PMC Previewer
ISSN : 1225-5009(Print)
ISSN : 2287-772X(Online)
Flower Research Journal Vol.33 No.3 pp.127-133
DOI : https://doi.org/10.11623/frj.2025.33.3.02

Evaluation of Soil Moisture Sensors for Automated Irrigation in Soil-Based Standard-type Chrysanthemum Cultivation

Hyuck Hwan Kwon1, Jae Woo Lee1, Jin Woo Jeong1, Bokyung Yang2, Seong Kwang An1,3*
1Department of Horticultural Bioscience, Pusan National University, Miryang, 50463, Korea
2Agricultural Technology Center, Busan Metropolitan City, Busan, 46702, Korea
3Life and Industry Convergence Research Institute, Pusan National University, Miryang 50463, Korea



†These authors contributed equally to this work.


Correspondence to Seong Kwang An Tel: +82-55-350-5521 E-mail: seongkwangan@pusan.ac.kr ORCID: https://orcid.org/ 0000-0003-0230-0114
08/06/2025 11/07/2025

Abstract


Korea’s aging rural workforce has led to serious labor shortages in chrysanthemum production, where approximately 90%–95% of growers still rely on conventional soil-based methods. Although sensor-driven automated irrigation is emerging as a labor-saving, resource-efficient technology, its use in soil-grown floricultural crops remains limited. This study assessed the suitability of soil moisture sensors for automated irrigation in the standard-type chrysanthemum “Baekgang”. Plants were cultivated in two soil-based greenhouses in Busan. Environmental conditions, including air temperature, humidity, vapor pressure deficit, and photosynthetic photon flux density, were recorded. Soil conditions were measured using FDR sensors (VWC and EC) and matric potential sensors, installed at a depth of 5 cm. Flowering quality was evaluated after the first harvest. Despite similar atmospheric conditions, soil water dynamics differed notably between farms. VWC averaged 23% in Farm A and 26% in Farm B, with fluctuations of ~6% and ~7%, respectively. Matric potential varied more widely, with range values of 32.6 kPa in Farm A and 51.2 kPa in Farm B, which reflects greater sensitivity to soil moisture changes. Farm A maintained stable moisture and lower EC, whereas Farm B experienced over-irrigation due to a high EC level of 8.25 mS·cm-1. These differences significantly reduced flower quality in Farm B, producing smaller capitulum (flower head) and thinner peduncles compared with flowers from Farm A. These findings demonstrate that matric potential sensors provide higher-resolution soil moisture data compared with VWC sensors. Therefore, combining matric potential and EC sensors is recommended for precise irrigation management in soil-based chrysanthemum production.




초록


    Introduction

    Korea’s rural population is aging rapidly, and the resulting labor shortage in the agricultural sector is becoming increasingly severe. Notably, approximately 78% of farmers cultivating flowers and ornamental crops, including chrysanthemums, are over 60 years old and continue to rely on labor-intensive cultivation practices, leading to low production efficiency (MAFRA, 2024). Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum x morifolium) is a crop that requires precise water management to achieve optimal growth and quality (Morrison, 2024). Despite the advantages of hydroponic cultivation in enabling more precise control, high initial costs associated with facility construction hinder its widespread adoption. Consequently, approximately 90–95% of cut flower chrysanthemum growers still utilize conventional soil-based methods (Oh et al., 2024).

    In recent years, sensor-based automated irrigation systems have been increasingly adopted across various crops and are considered a core technology for advancing agricultural automation. Among these, systems incorporating soil moisture sensors offer the advantage of real-time irrigation control based on crop water requirements, thereby reducing labor inputs and improving resource efficiency (Montesano et al., 2018). However, most existing studies have focused primarily on soilless or substrate-based cultivation systems (Vera et al., 2021), and research on sensor-based irrigation systems optimized for soil-based cultivation remains limited.

    Accordingly, this study aims to evaluate the suitability of soil moisture sensors for accurate water status monitoring under conventional soil cultivation conditions.

    Materials and Methods

    Plant and growth conditions

    This study was conducted in two standard-type chrysanthemum greenhouses located in Gangseo-gu, Busan, Korea. Although both greenhouses were equipped with fertigation systems (WIN-5000S, WOOSUNG HIGHTEC CO., LTD., Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea), irrigation and fertigation were manually applied based on each farmer’s decision, taking into account the specific soil conditions on each farm. To minimize environmental variability, two greenhouses approximately 200 meters apart were selected: Farm A (35.2111°N, 128.9268°E) and Farm B (35.2120°N, 128.9290°E) (Fig. 1A). The chrysanthemum cultivar used was ‘Baekgang’, bred in Korea (Fig. 1B). Uniform plants were transplanted around September 20, 2024, and cultivated for approximately 150 days until the harvest of the first flower.

    Atmosphere and soil environmental monitoring

    To monitor both aboveground and belowground environments in real time, a data logger (ZL6, METER Group, Pullman, WA, USA) was employed. An air temperature and humidity sensor (ATMOS 14, METER Group) and a quantum sensor (SQ-521, Apogee Instruments, Logan, UT, USA) were connected to the logger to measure air temperature, relative humidity, vapor pressure deficit (VPD), and photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD).

    For soil condition monitoring, the same logger was connected to soil moisture and electrical conductivity (EC) sensors (TEROS 12, METER Group) using the FDR method to measure volumetric water content (VWC; %) and bulk EC (mS·cm-1). For accurate VWC measurement, a calibration equation (θ = 3.88 × 10-4 × sensor output − 0.696) was applied, considering soil hydraulic properties. Bulk EC values were converted to pore water EC using the Hilhorst equation (Hilhorst, 2000). Additionally, a soil matric potential (SMP) sensor (TEROS 21, METER Group) was used to assess matric potential (kPa). All sensors were installed at a 5 cm depth to target the effective rhizosphere, where water and nutrient uptake are most active, following the manufacturer’s guidelines. Two replicates of each sensor type were installed in each greenhouse.

    Flowering quality and data analysis

    To evaluate flowering quality, at least three flowers were harvested from each farm. Growth characteristics such as plant height (from the base to the apical tip) and peduncle length (from the bract to receptacle), peduncle thickness were measured at harvest. The flowers were subsequently placed in a preservative solution containing FloraLife® 200 (Smithers-Oasis Company, SC, USA) and maintained at room temperature (24.0 ± 1.1°C) and relative humidity (60.5±6.2%) until full bloom. At that stage, flowering quality characteristics such as capitulum (inflorescence) diameter and height were measured.

    An independent two-sample t-test was conducted to compare flowering quality between two greenhouses. Prior to each t-test, homogeneity of variance was assessed using the folded F-test. When the assumption of equal variances was met (Pr > F > 0.05), pooled variance estimates were used; otherwise, the Satterthwaite approximation was applied. All analyses were performed using SAS software (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Graphs were generated using SigmaPlot (ver. 11.0; Systat Software Inc., USA).

    Results and Discussion

    During the cultivation of Chrysanthemum ‘Baekgang’ in the two greenhouses, average air temperature was 18.3 ± 2.9°C in Farm A and 16.8 ± 2.6°C in Farm B. Relative humidity averaged 85.3 ± 13.6% and 85.4 ± 10.6%, respectively, indicating similar atmospheric conditions (Fig. 2). According to RDA (2024), the temperature and RH in both farms were within the optimal range for chrysanthemum production. VPD, a key parameter affecting plant transpiration, was 0.37 ± 0.3 kPa in Farm A and 0.32 ± 0.3 kPa in Farm B. The average PPFD was 359.6 μmol·m-2·s-1 in Farm A and 355.2 μmol·m-2·s-1 in Farm B. These results confirm that ambient conditions were similar across the two sites during the winter season (Fig. 3).

    VWC averaged 23.0 ± 0.2% in Farm A and 26.2 ± 0.3% in Farm B, with a consistent difference of about 3% (Fig. 4). Maximum VWC values were 26.9% in Farm A and 29.6% in Farm B, while minimum values were 20.8% and 22.2%, respectively. In contrast, SMP showed clearer differences, with an average of −10.2 ± 2.5 kPa in Farm A and −6.8 ± 1.6 kPa in Farm B. Based on the actual changes in SMP observed during the experiment, Farm A maintained SMP near the water saturation level (0 kPa) for approximately 60 days after planting, and subsequently kept the SMP within the range of field capacity (-10 to -33 kPa) until harvest. In contrast, Farm B maintained water saturation conditions for about 100 days after treatment, after which the SMP gradually declined to approximately -51 kPa until harvest. The differing irrigation strategies between the two farms, as monitored through SMP measurements, were attributed to variations in soil electrical conductivity (EC). Farm B exhibited a very high pore-water EC of 8.25 mS·cm-1 due to salt accumulation in the soil where chrysanthemums were cultivated (Fig. 5). Consequently, saturated irrigation was applied for approximately 100 days to mitigate growth inhibition caused by salinity stress, which resulted in a reduction of pore-water EC to about 3.5 mS·cm-1 by day 100.

    In recent years, the development of automated irrigation systems based on soil moisture sensors have been developed to improve the water use efficiency and crop quality in greenhouse cultivation for horticultural crops. Among these, systems utilizing FDR or capacitance sensors have gained attention due to their cost-effectiveness. While these sensors are primarily applied in soilless cultivation using containers (Wheeler et al., 2018), efforts are also underway to develop irrigation systems employing FDR sensors for soil-based cultivation in open field and greenhouse (Abdelmoneim et al., 2025;Martínez-Gimeno et al., 2020). Kang et al. (2021) reported that when SMPs ranged from –10 kPa to –100 kPa, the corresponding VWC measured using FDR sensors varied by as little as 5% and up to 12%. These findings are consistent with the results of the present study, which demonstrated that changes in VWC measured by the FDR sensor were smaller than the corresponding changes in SMP under the same moisture conditions in soil. The observed variation falls within the typical ±3% measurement error of FDR sensors. Since the range of change is comparable to the sensor’s accuracy threshold, the validity of the measurements is uncertain. Therefore, the applicability of FDR sensors under these experimental conditions should be carefully reconsidered. This is consistent with findings by Kim et al. (2021), who reported that matric potential sensors provide approximately 6.6 times higher resolution than FDR sensors at comparable moisture levels.

    When evaluating the flowering quality of chrysanthemums, the thickness of the peduncle, an important factor for postharvest quality, was significantly greater on Farm A (6.9 ± 0.1 mm) than on Farm B (5.7 ± 0.2 mm), with the difference being statistically significant (p = 0.0143) (Table 1). Similarly, the capitulum diameter, another indicator of flower size, was significantly larger (p = 0.0307) in chrysanthemums grown on Farm A (106.6 ± 6.9 mm) compared to those from Farm B (77.4 ± 4.7 mm). Although the capitulum height, another measure of flower size, did not show a statistically significant difference, chrysanthemums from Farm A exhibited a 40% greater height (38.5 ± 4.7 mm) than those from Farm B (27.5 ± 2.2 mm). In addition, the number of days to flowering was significantly shorter in Farm A (109 days) than in Farm B (150 days).

    Throughout the cultivation period, above-ground environmental conditions were similar between the two farms. However, differences in soil moisture and management led to significant differences in flowering quality. In particular, the reduced flowering quality observed in Farm B is likely attributable to elevated soil salinity and prolonged over-saturated conditions.

    To develop an effective automated irrigation system for soil-based chrysanthemum cultivation, SMP are more appropriate than VWC sensors due to their greater sensitivity to soil water status. Furthermore, integrating soil EC sensors with chemical property analyses is essential for managing nutrient and salinity levels. Such an approach would enable more precise irrigation control and enhance crop quality in cut chrysanthemum production.

    Acknowledgments

    This study was supported by Academic Research Project for the Busan Technology Dissemination Blending Collaboration Model between the Busan Agricultural Technology Center and the Rural Development Administration, 2024 and Pusan National University Research Grant, 2022.

    Figure

    FRJ-33-3-127_F1.jpg

    Locations of two greenhouses (A) and flowers of standard-type chrysanthemum ‘Baekgang’ (B) used in the study.

    FRJ-33-3-127_F2.jpg

    Changes in average air temperature and relative humidity (RH) in two different farms for growing standard-type chrysanthemum ‘Baekgang’ during the winter season. The air temperature and relative humidity were calculated as daily mean values.

    FRJ-33-3-127_F3.jpg

    Changes in average photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) and vapor pressure deficit (VPD) in two different farms for growing standard-type chrysanthemum ‘Baekgang’ during the winter season. The average PPFD was calculated as the mean values during the day, whereas the VPD corresponds to the daily mean value.

    FRJ-33-3-127_F4.jpg

    Changes in average volumetric water content (VWC) and soil matric potential (SMP) in two different farms for growing standard-type chrysanthemum ‘Baekgang’ during the winter season. VWC was measured using FDR sensors (TEROS 12) and SMP using matric potential sensors (TEROS 21); both values are presented as daily means (n=2).

    FRJ-33-3-127_F5.jpg

    Pore-water EC (mS?cm-1) trends in two different farms for growing standard-type chrysanthemum ‘Baekgang’ during the winter season. Pore-water EC was measured using an FDR sensor (TEROS 12) and is presented as a daily mean value (n=2).

    Table

    Flowering quality of standard-type Chrysanthemum ‘Baekgang’ grown under two different greenhouses in Busan

    zMean standard error (n = 3).
    P-values were obtained from independent two-sample t-tests comparing each trait between the two farms.

    Reference

    1. Abdelmoneim AA, Al Kalaany CM, Dragonetti G, Derardja B, Khadra R ( 2025) Comparative analysis of soil moisture- and weather-based irrigation scheduling for drip-irrigated lettuce using low-cost internet of things capacitive sensors. Sens 25:1568
    2. Hilhorst MA ( 2000) A pore water conductivity sensor. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:1922-1925
    3. Kang SH, Kim YJ, Lee SB, Kim HT, Kim MY ( 2021) Development of soil moisture control system based on irrigation threshold criteria algorithm. J Agric and Life Sci 55:115-120
    4. Kim J, An SK, Kim J ( 2021) Selection of proper soil sensors for effective soil water and nutrient management in orchards. Hortic Sci Technol 39:132 (Abstr)
    5. Martínez-Gimeno MA, Jiménez-Bello MA, Lidón A, Manzano J, Badal E, Pérez-Pérez JG, Bonet L, Intrigliolo DS, Esteban A ( 2020) Mandarin irrigation scheduling by means of frequency domain reflectometry soil moisture monitoring. Agric Water Manage 235:106151
    6. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) ( 2024) 2023 Status of floricultural crop production. Sejong, Korea.
    7. Montesano FF, Van Iersel MW, Boari F, Cantore V, D’Amato G, Parente A ( 2018) Sensor-based irrigation management of soilless basil using a new smart irrigation system: Effects of set-point on plant physiological responses and crop performance. Agric Water Manage 203:20–29
    8. Morrison K ( 2024) Precision irrigation to improve greenhouse production by reducing water and fertilizer inputs of geranium, petunia, chrysanthemum, and poinsettia. MS-thesis, Oklahoma State University, USA
    9. Oh HG, Lee MJ, Jeong JH, Jin MJ, Park JU ( 2024) Comparison of cut flower chrysanthemum growth between hydroponics and soil fertigation cultivation. Flower Res J 32: 385-393.
    10. Rural Development Administration (RDA) ( 2024) Chrysanthemum (Agricultural technology guide 130) Kyungsung Media Group, Seoul
    11. Vera J, Conejero W, Mira-García AB, Conesa MR, Ruiz-Sánchez MC ( 2021) Towards irrigation automation based on dielectric soil sensors. J. Hortic Sci and Biotechnol 96:696–707
    12. Wheeler WD, Thomas P, Van Iersel M, Chappell M ( 2018) Implementation of sensor-based automated irrigation in commercial floriculture production: A case study. HortTechnology 28:719-727
    
    1. SEARCH
    2. Journal Abbreviation : 'Flower Res. J.'
      Frequency : Quarterly
      Doi Prefix : 10.11623/frj.
      ISSN : 1225-5009 (Print) / 2287-772X (Online)
      Year of Launching : 1991
      Publisher : The Korean Society for Floricultural Science
      Indexed/Tracked/Covered By :

    3. Online Submission

      submission.ijfs.org

    4. Template DOWNLOAD

      Original Research
      Articles
      국문 영문
      Review Articles 리뷰
      ★NEWTechnical Reports단보
      New Cultivar
      Introduction
      품종
    5. 논문유사도검사

    6. KSFS

      Korean Society for
      Floricultural Science

    7. Contact Us
      Flower Research Journal

      - Tel: +82-54-820-5472
      - E-mail: kafid@hanmail.net