Journal Search Engine
Download PDF Export Citation PMC Previewer
ISSN : 1225-5009(Print)
ISSN : 2287-772X(Online)
Flower Research Journal Vol.33 No.4 pp.293-307
DOI : https://doi.org/10.11623/frj.2025.33.4.17

Nitric Oxide–Mediated Stress Tolerance in Ornamental Plants Under Climate Change– Related Abiotic Conditions: Insights from Model Plant Studies

Tiba Nazar Ibrahim Al Azzawi1, Murtaza Khan2, Sajad Ali3*
1Department of Horticulture, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea
2Agriculture and Life Science Research Institute, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 24341, Korea
3Department of Biological Sciences, College of Science, King Faisal University, Al-Asha, 31982, Saudi Arabia


Correspondence to Sajad Ali Tel: +966-135896801 E-mail: sabhat@kfu.edu.sa ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3230-1436
03/12/2025 09/12/2025

Abstract


Climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of abiotic stresses, including drought, salinity, heat, cold, and fluctuating light intensity, posing significant challenges to ornamental plant growth, market quality, and postharvest performance. Nitric oxide (NO) has emerged as a key gaseous signaling molecule involved in plant adaptive responses to such stress conditions. Although extensive research in model plants, particularly Arabidopsisthaliana, has elucidated NO biosynthesis pathways, redox signaling networks, hormone crosstalk, and S-nitrosylation-based regulation, comparable mechanistic studies in ornamental species remain limited. Existing evidence from Rosa, Tagetes, Gazania, Gerbera, Lilium, Chrysanthemum, Petunia, Zinnia, and other floricultural crops suggests that NO enhances stress resilience by regulating antioxidant activity, maintaining photosynthetic efficiency, stabilizing cellular membranes, modulating stomatal behavior, and extending vase life through delayed senescence. This review synthesizes the current state of knowledge on NO-mediated abiotic stress tolerance in ornamental plants within the context of climate change impacts and compares these findings with well-characterized NO functions in model systems. By identifying parallel mechanisms, knowledge gaps, and translational opportunities, we highlight experimental directions that may accelerate the application of NO-based approaches in floriculture. Finally, the review discusses practical implications, including the use of exogenous NO donors, priming strategies, and advanced delivery systems, as potential tools for improving climate resilience in ornamental horticulture.




초록


    Introduction

    Climate change is accelerating the occurrence and intensity of abiotic stresses, including heat, drought, salinity, cold events, and extreme light exposure, creating increasingly unstable growing conditions for horticultural systems worldwide (Shah et al. 2024). While such stresses have been widely investigated in staple food crops, ornamental plants have received comparatively limited scientific attention despite their high economic value, ecological relevance, and cultural contribution to urban greening, aesthetics, and psychological well-being (Karagüzel 2025;Mircea et al., 2024). Unlike yield-focused crops, ornamental species are evaluated based on aesthetic and postharvest attributes—including floral longevity, pigmentation stability, fragrance, morphology, and leaf quality—which are highly sensitive to abiotic damage (Liu 2025;Partap et al. 2023). Even mild environmental fluctuations can reduce commercial value, underscoring the need for innovative, stress-resilient cultivation strategies amid climate uncertainty.

    Nitric oxide (NO), a highly conserved gaseous signaling molecule, has emerged as a key regulator of plant responses to adverse environments. Studies in A. thaliana and rice have elucidated major components of NO biosynthesis and signaling, particularly its role in integrating redox homeostasis, hormone crosstalk, and stress-responsive gene expression via mechanisms such as S-nitrosylation and controlled interaction with reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Hussain et al. 2016;Khan, Al Azzawi et al., 2023;Khan et al. 2023;Khan et al. 2023;Niyoifasha et al. 2023;Rahim et al. 2022). These mechanistic foundations offer a valuable framework for interpreting NO responses in species where molecular annotations are limited—such as ornamentals, many of which lack complete genomic or transcriptomic resources.

    Translational evidence from diverse ornamental species—including Rosa, Chrysanthemum, Gazania, Lilium, Gerbera, Petunia, Tagetes, Hibiscus, and Zinnia—demonstrates that endogenous and exogenously applied NO improves tolerance to salinity, drought, heat, and oxidative stress while enhancing flowering, delaying senescence, and improving vase life (Abbasi et al. 2020;Aftab et al. 2024;Ahsan et al. 2025;Arun et al. 2016;Gabaldón et al. 2005;Jafari and Daneshvar 2020;Naing et al. 2017;Park et al. 2023;Seyf et al. 2012). These benefits are largely linked to enhanced antioxidant activity, maintenance of cellular osmotic balance, optimized stomatal behavior, and protection of photosynthetic machinery (Al Azzawi et al. 2023;Corpas et al. 2021;Hajihashemi and Jahantigh 2023;Khan et al. 2019).

    Despite these advances, several gaps limit the widespread integration of NO-based approaches in ornamental horticulture. Challenges include inconsistent experimental reporting of donor type, concentration, and timing (Arasimowicz‐Jelonek et al. 2011), limited mechanistic work beyond Arabidopsis and a few model ornamentals (Khan et al. 2023;Wills et al. 2015), and the scarcity of long-term or climate-simulated studies that reflect real-world stress combinations typical of future environmental conditions (Mittler et al. 2022;Muhammad et al. 2025). Furthermore, unique ornamentalspecific traits—such as rapid postharvest decline, pigment instability, and high sensitivity to handling— suggest that NO roles may differ from traditional crop-focused stress paradigms.

    Given these considerations, this review aims to synthesize mechanistic insights from NO research in Arabidopsis and relate them to emerging findings in ornamental species under climate change–related abiotic stress conditions. By comparing model-based understanding with translational applications in floriculture, we highlight research priorities, practical considerations, and opportunities for integrating NO-based strategies to enhance resilience and maintain ornamental quality under future environmental scenarios.

    Climate Change–Related Abiotic Stress Challenges in Ornamental Plants

    Climate change is reshaping environmental conditions, exposing ornamental plants to increasingly variable and unpredictable abiotic stress regimes. Unlike staple crops, where yield remains the primary benchmark, ornamentals are highly sensitive to qualitative damage such as leaf scorching, flower deformation, pigment fading, or premature senescence—traits that directly affect aesthetic and market value. Abiotic stress factors often occur in combination rather than isolation, amplifying physiological strain and accelerating postharvest decline. As a result, floricultural production systems, nurseries, and landscape environments require physiological resilience beyond what many cultivated ornamentals currently possess.

    Drought, waterlogging, and heat stress are among the most prevalent consequences of climate warming, driven by extended heat waves and reduced rainfall frequency. These conditions disrupt cellular osmotic balance, impair photosynthesis, and accelerate oxidative stress, resulting in delayed or aborted flowering in species such as G. rigens, Phragmites communis, C. morifolium, and Cucumis sativus (Ahsan et al. 2025;Fan et al. 2014;Song et al. 2006;Yang et al. 2011).

    Similarly, salinity stress has become increasingly common due to rising sea levels, soil degradation, and reliance on low-quality irrigation water, reducing biomass, chlorophyll stability, and flower size in species such as petunia and carnation (Abbasi et al. 2020;Arun et al. 2016).

    Extreme climate-driven stresses—including cold, ozone, and ultraviolet (UV) exposure—pose increasing challenges to ornamental horticulture, particularly for species with low natural tolerance. Cold stress has been shown to severely impair physiological stability in sensitive ornamental species such as Anthurium andraeanum and Cynodon dactylon (Fan et al. 2015;Sun et al. 2023). In parallel, elevated UV-B radiation—now recognized as a growing environmental pressure linked to atmospheric changes—interacts with heat, drought, and salinity to disrupt pigment regulation, leaf anatomy, and oxidative balance across multiple ornamental taxa (Bornman et al. 2019). Atmospheric ozone pollution represents another emerging threat, reducing photosynthesis and accelerating visible leaf injury in ornamentals including Cotinus coggygria, T. erecta, and R. chinensis, with specieslevel variation in physiological tolerance (Liang et al. 2018). Across these diverse stress contexts, NO appears to function as a key regulatory signal mediating antioxidant activity, stress gene regulation, and redox homeostasis in ornamental species undergoing environmental stress (Simontacchi et al. 2015).

    To contextualize these climate-linked challenges, Table 1 summarizes key stress types, their environmental drivers, and representative impacts on ornamental species.

    NO as a Stress Regulator: Key Mechanisms (Evidence from Model Plants)

    NO is a small, highly diffusible gaseous molecule that functions as a central signaling hub in plant stress responses. In model plants, especially A. thaliana, extensive research has elucidated its biosynthesis, interactions with hormonal and redox networks, and downstream regulation of stress-responsive genes, providing a foundational framework for translational research in ornamentals.

    NO biosynthesis pathways

    NO production in plants occurs through multiple enzymatic and non-enzymatic routes. The nitrate reductase (NR)-dependent pathway reduces nitrate (NO₃⁻) to nitrite (NO₂⁻), which can then be converted to NO under specific cellular conditions, particularly during abiotic stress (Khan et al. 2023). In addition to NR activity, plants exhibit nitric oxide synthase (NOS)-like activities capable of catalyzing NO formation from L-arginine. However, despite functional evidence of such activities, a canonical animal-type NOS gene has not yet been conclusively identified in higher plants, and its molecular identity remains a subject of ongoing debate and investigation within the research community. Non-enzymatic routes also contribute substantially to NO pools, especially under acidic conditions or in the presence of reducing agents, facilitating rapid NO accumulation during oxidative or environmental stress (Khan et al. 2023). Together, these complementary pathways enable plants to fine-tune NO homeostasis and ensure precise spatiotemporal signaling in response to developmental cues and stress stimuli.

    Crosstalk with Hormonal Signaling

    NO interacts extensively with phytohormones, integrating stress perception with growth and developmental modulation. Abscisic acid (ABA) and NO act synergistically to regulate stomatal closure under drought and heat stress, optimizing water-use efficiency (Lombardo and Lamattina 2018). NO also modulates ethylene biosynthesis and signaling, influencing senescence and programmed cell death, while interacting with jasmonic acid and salicylic acid pathways to orchestrate defense responses (Khan et al. 2021;Khan et al. 2023). This hormonal crosstalk ensures that NO-mediated signaling is dynamically adjusted according to stress intensity, developmental stage, and tissue type.

    Regulation of ROS–NO Balance

    Abiotic stresses often lead to excessive accumulation of ROS, which can cause oxidative damage. NO contributes to maintaining redox homeostasis through direct scavenging of ROS and by modulating the activity of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX). This fine-tuned balance between ROS and NO not only mitigates cellular damage but also functions as a signaling mechanism, where transient ROS bursts act in concert with NO to activate adaptive responses (Khan et al. 2023;Rahim et al. 2022;Rolly et al. 2020).

    Post-Translational Modifications

    A key mechanism by which NO exerts its regulatory effects is through post-translational modifications, particularly S-nitrosylation—the reversible addition of a NO group to cysteine thiols on target proteins. S-nitrosylation can alter protein activity, localization, stability, or interactions, enabling rapid modulation of signaling networks in response to environmental cues. In Arabidopsis, proteins involved in photosynthesis, antioxidant defense, hormone signaling, and transcriptional regulation have been identified as NO targets, highlighting the breadth of NO-mediated modulation (Pande et al. 2022).

    Regulation of Stress-Responsive Genes and Transcription Factors (TFs)

    NO also regulates gene expression by influencing TFs and stress-responsive genes. Key TF families, including WRKY, NAC, and bZIP, are modulated by NO under various abiotic stresses (Aslam et al. 2019;Falak et al. 2021;Nabi et al. 2021). WRKY TFs are often involved in ROS detoxification and defense signaling, NAC TFs coordinate osmotic and heat stress responses, and bZIP TFs regulate ABA-dependent stress pathways (Aslam et al. 2019). Through these targets, NO can orchestrate a broad transcriptional reprogramming, integrating environmental signals with growth and defense priorities.

    Translational Relevance for Ornamentals

    Collectively, these mechanistic insights from model plants serve as a “toolbox” for ornamental research. By understanding NO biosynthesis, hormone interactions, ROS regulation, post-translational modifications, and gene regulatory networks, researchers can identify candidate pathways and molecular targets to enhance stress tolerance in ornamental species. This framework is particularly valuable for species with limited genomic resources, allowing hypothesis-driven experimentation using exogenous NO donors, priming strategies, or molecular breeding approaches to improve resilience under climate change-related stresses.

    Evidence of NO-Mediated Stress Tolerance in Ornamental Plants

    Accumulating evidence demonstrates that NO acts as a multifunctional regulator of stress tolerance in ornamental species, functioning through mechanisms that parallel—but are not always identical to—those characterized in model plants. Ornamentals exhibit high sensitivity to environmental fluctuations and rapid postharvest decline, making NO particularly relevant in improving both stress resilience and market value.

    NO enhances stress tolerance and physiological performance by regulating antioxidant defense systems, maintaining osmotic and ionic balance, modulating cellular redox signaling, stabilizing proteins via S-nitrosylation, and interacting with hormonal pathways including ABA, ethylene, and jasmonates. Exogenous application of NO donors, such as SNP or S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), has been shown to alleviate abiotic stress and delay senescence in multiple ornamental genera, including Rosa, Tagetes, Gazania, Gerbera, Lilium, Chrysanthemum, Petunia, Zinnia. Additionally, NO treatments frequently extend vase life, preserve pigment stability, and maintain overall postharvest quality (Abbasi et al. 2020;Aftab et al. 2024;Ahsan et al. 2025;Arun et al. 2016;Gabaldón et al. 2005;Jafari and Daneshvar 2020;Naing et al. 2017;Park et al. 2023;Seyf et al. 2012).

    Drought Stress

    Drought remains one of the most limiting factors in ornamental horticulture, affecting both vegetative growth and flowering quality, similar to its impact observed in rice (Al Azzawi et al. 2020). NO enhances drought tolerance by regulating stomatal closure, maintaining water-use efficiency, and activating antioxidant systems to mitigate oxidative stress (Khan et al. 2019). Studies in G. rigens, T. erecta, L. esculentum, Festuca arundinacea, F. glaucescens, and Lagenaria siceraria have shown that exogenous application of NO donors such as sodium nitroprusside (SNP) increases SOD and CAT activities, reduces lipid peroxidation, and stabilizes photosynthetic performance under water-deficit conditions (Kaya et al. 2024;Liao et al. 2012;Perlikowski et al. 2022;Zhang et al. 2024).

    Salinity Stress

    Soil salinity impairs ornamental growth by disrupting ion balance and increasing oxidative stress. NO mitigates these effects by improving Na⁺/K⁺ homeostasis, strengthening antioxidant defenses, and stabilizing cellular membranes. For example, SNP treatment in G. jamesonii and Hylotelephium erythrostictum increased chlorophyll levels, enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity, and reduced lipid peroxidation (Abbasi et al. 2020;Chen et al. 2019;Wang et al. 2024). Similar physiological improvements observed in Petunia hybrida and other plant systems support a conserved NO-mediated salt tolerance mechanism involving ion regulation, redox control, and gene expression adjustment (Alnusairi et al. 2021;Arun et al. 2016;Wei et al. 2022).

    Heat Stress

    Heat stress causes protein denaturation, membrane damage, and photosynthetic impairment. NO enhances thermotolerance through antioxidant activation and modulation of heat-responsive transcriptional pathways. In C. morifolium, SNP treatment maintained chlorophyll content, reduced oxidative injury, and elevated SOD, CAT, POD, and APX activities (Yang et al. 2011). Transcriptomic evidence in L. longiflorum further demonstrates NO-mediated induction of HSPs via heat shock transcription factors (HSFs), contributing to cellular protection under elevated temperatures (Zhou et al. 2022). Similar benefits are reported in Arabidopsis, T. aestivum, and S. lycopersicum, where NO enhances PSII efficiency, improves ROS homeostasis, and strengthens heat-responsive gene expression (Hasanuzzaman et al. 2012;Parankusam et al. 2017;Wu et al. 2012;Zhao et al. 2010). Collectively, these findings demonstrate that NO protects photosynthetic machinery, enhances antioxidant defenses, stabilizes membranes, and activates HSF–HSP pathways, positioning it as a promising biostimulant for improving heat tolerance in ornamental and crop species.

    Cold Stress

    Low temperatures impair membrane function, metabolism, and reproductive development. NO contributes to cold tolerance by reducing oxidative stress, increasing osmolyte accumulation, and activating cold-responsive signaling cascades. Pretreatment with SNP in Anthurium andraeanum reduced electrolyte leakage and enhanced antioxidant responses (Liang et al. 2018). In Ziziphus jujube, NO-mediated S-nitrosylation stabilized antioxidant enzymes during chilling (Zhang et al. 2023).

    Mechanistic insights from model plants confirm NO involvement in CBF-dependent cold response pathways (Zhao et al. 2009). reinforcing its role in low-temperature adaptation of ornamentals.

    Postharvest Senescence

    Postharvest decline is a major bottleneck in the ornamental industry. NO delays floral senescence by suppressing ethylene synthesis, reducing ROS accumulation, and maintaining pigment and membrane integrity. SNP applications have extended vase life and improved postharvest attributes in R. hybrida, Dianthus caryophyllus, Gladiolus, and Consolida ajacis (Liao et al. 2013;Naing et al. 2017;Seyf et al. 2012;Ul Haq et al. 2021;Zulfiqar et al. 2024). Further, NO enhanced pigment retention in Narcissus tazetta and improved solution uptake and oxidative balance in Antirrhinum majus (Farooq et al. 2024;Hajihashemi and Jahantigh, 2023). These outcomes emphasize the potential of NO as a postharvest biostimulant.

    Table 2 summarizes representative studies demonstrating the role of exogenous NO in enhancing stress tolerance, improving developmental traits, and extending postharvest longevity in ornamental plants. The table consolidates species, stress categories, NO source and concentrations, major physiological responses, and functional outcomes. By organizing evidence across systems, Table 2 highlights the consistency of NO-mediated regulatory effects and identifies concentration ranges frequently reported as effective across species.

    Fig. 1 illustrates the integrative role of NO as a master regulator of plant responses to abiotic stress. NO is generated through multiple interconnected routes, including nitrate reductase (NR)-dependent and NOS-like enzymatic pathways, as well as non-enzymatic, ROS-mediated, and antioxidant-associated processes, reflecting the tight coupling between redox metabolism and NO signaling. Once formed, NO exerts its regulatory function primarily through post-translational modifications, particularly S-nitrosylation, which alters the activity of key regulatory proteins such as TFs and stress-responsive enzymes. Through these molecular modifications, NO fine-tunes stress signaling either by directly targeting cellular components or by acting synergistically with other signaling messengers.

    At the physiological level, NO-mediated regulation translates into distinct stress-adaptive functions: under drought conditions, NO promotes stomatal closure and osmotic adjustment; during salinity stress, it contributes to Na⁺/K⁺ homeostasis; under heat stress, it enhances thermotolerance through heat shock protein induction and ROS detoxification; during cold stress, it supports membrane stabilization and antifreeze protein regulation; and in postharvest contexts, NO delays senescence by suppressing ethylene signaling. Collectively, these coordinated molecular and physiological actions underscore NO as a versatile and integrative regulator of plant stress resilience.

    Translational Lessons from Model Plants to Ornamentals

    Mechanistic insights derived from A. thaliana and other model plants provide a powerful foundation for translating NO-mediated stress tolerance into ornamental plant systems. Core discoveries related to enzymatic and non-enzymatic NO biosynthesis, S-nitrosylation-based protein regulation, ROS–NO signaling integration, and TF–mediated control of stress-responsive genes define a transferable regulatory framework that is highly relevant to ornamentals facing increasing environmental instability. Unlike food crops, ornamental plants must maintain not only survival and productivity but also strict aesthetic standards, including flower size, color, form, and postharvest longevity. Thus, the translation of NO biology into this sector requires precision strategies that enhance stress resilience without compromising visual and commercial quality. As illustrated in Fig. 2, four complementary translational routes emerge that bridge molecular mechanisms with applied ornamental horticulture.

    Fig. 2A highlights genome editing as a precise strategy for manipulating NO biosynthesis and signaling pathways in ornamentals. Targeted modification of genes encoding nitrate reductase, NOS-like enzymes, NO-responsive TFs, and redox regulators using CRISPR/Cas technologies enables fine control of endogenous NO production and downstream stress signaling. Such precision editing allows enhancement of drought, salinity, heat, and cold tolerance while preserving floral morphology, pigmentation, and fragrance—traits that are often negatively affected by conventional stress-tolerance breeding. Importantly, this approach also enables the uncoupling of stress resistance from growth penalties, offering a major advantage for high-value ornamental species where both stress performance and aesthetic quality must be optimized simultaneously. In parallel, Fig. 2B emphasizes the exploitation of natural variation through systematic screening of ornamental germplasm for NO responsiveness. By evaluating cultivars, breeding lines, and wild relatives for endogenous NO levels, NO-induced antioxidant capacity, ion homeostasis, and membrane stability, superior NO-responsive genotypes can be identified and directly integrated into breeding or vegetative propagation programs. This strategy is particularly powerful for clonally propagated ornamentals, where elite stress-resilient phenotypes can be rapidly fixed and deployed without lengthy breeding cycles.

    Beyond genetic approaches, Fig. 2C illustrates the direct integration of NO into propagation and crop-management practices through the application of exogenous NO donors and NO-priming treatments. Compounds such as SNP and GSNO can be applied during seed germination, seedling establishment, irrigation, and postharvest handling to enhance antioxidant enzyme activity, stabilize cellular membranes, regulate ion balance, and suppress stress-induced senescence. In ornamental production systems, these physiological benefits translate into improved establishment under stress, delayed leaf yellowing, maintenance of pigment intensity, and prolonged vase life of cut flowers. This management-based strategy is especially attractive because it is rapid, cost-effective, and readily scalable for commercial nursery and greenhouse operations without requiring genetic modification.

    Finally, Fig. 2D underscores the importance of bridging mechanistic NO research with applied validation under realistic climate stress scenarios. Integrating molecular and physiological NO responses with ornamental-specific performance traits under cyclic drought, heat waves, salinity intrusion, and enhanced UV exposure ensures that laboratory-derived benefits remain stable in real-world production systems. Such integrative testing also allows the identification of potential trade-offs between stress protection and decorative quality, a critical limitation that currently restricts the deployment of stress physiology innovations in ornamental horticulture.

    Together, the four translational strategies summarized in Fig. 2 establish a coherent pipeline that moves from NO-regulated genes and signaling networks to elite cultivar development and climate-resilient crop management systems. By aligning molecular precision tools, physiological screening, and industry-ready management practices, NO-centered approaches provide a powerful framework for transforming ornamental stress management from empirical intervention to mechanism-guided innovation. In the context of intensifying climate variability, such integration is essential for safeguarding both the sustainability and the high commercial value of ornamental plant production.

    Practical Applications and Future Potential

    NO offers multiple practical opportunities to enhance ornamental plant resilience and quality across production phases. Exogenous NO donors such as SNP and GSNO can be applied foliarly or via substrate to improve drought, salinity, heat, and oxidative stress tolerance while maintaining key aesthetic traits such as color uniformity, petal integrity, and vegetative form. Seed priming and nursery-stage NO treatments further enhance germination, early vigor, and stress preparedness, offering particular value for high-cost or stress-sensitive floriculture crops.

    In the postharvest phase, NO application delays senescence, inhibits ethylene action, stabilizes pigmentation, and extends vase life in cut flowers including rose and carnation, contributing to reduced waste and improved marketable shelf life. These effects translate into potential economic benefits through decreased postharvest losses and longer retail display periods.

    Emerging strategies, including nanotechnology-based NO delivery systems and controlled-release formulations, have shown promise for improving delivery precision, stability, and treatment efficiency. However, adoption of such advanced technologies may be constrained by production costs, regulatory requirements, and scalability challenges. While early studies indicate that long-term returns may offset investment—particularly through reduced chemical inputs and improved postharvest longevity—comprehensive cost–benefit assessments and field-scale evaluations remain needed before widespread commercial deployment.

    Future integration with automated irrigation, hydroponics, and smart greenhouse systems could enable real-time, demand-driven NO application, supporting precision horticulture tailored to climate-adaptive production. Collectively, these applications position NO as a versatile tool capable of bridging mechanistic understanding with scalable, economically informed solutions for ornamental horticulture.

    Conclusion

    NO represents a central regulator of plant stress tolerance with considerable potential for ornamental horticulture under climate change. Insights from model plants such as A. thaliana have revealed key biosynthesis pathways, hormonal interactions, redox regulation, and transcriptional networks that can be directly translated to ornamentals. Evidence from numerous plants demonstrates that NO enhances drought, salinity, heat, cold, and postharvest stress tolerance, largely through antioxidant activation, osmotic regulation, and hormonal modulation.

    Practical applications—ranging from exogenous NO donors, seed priming, and postharvest treatments to advanced nanotechnology-based delivery and integration with smart greenhouse systems—highlight NO’s potential as a climate-resilience tool for floriculture. Future research should focus on translating mechanistic insights from model species, optimizing application protocols, and screening ornamental germplasm for NO responsiveness. By bridging fundamental biology with applied horticulture, NO-based strategies can enhance ornamental plant quality, longevity, and sustainability in an era of increasingly variable and extreme environmental conditions.

    Figure

    FRJ-33-4-293_F1.jpg

    Schematic representation of nitric oxide (NO) biosynthesis and signaling in plant abiotic stress tolerance. NO is produced through enzymatic and non-enzymatic pathways and regulates stress adaptation primarily via S-nitrosylation and transcriptional control. These processes collectively enhance plant resilience to drought, salinity, heat, cold, and postharvest stresses.

    FRJ-33-4-293_F2.jpg

    Translational strategies for applying NO research from model plants to ornamentals. (A) genome editing of NO-related genes, (B) screening germplasm for NO responsiveness, (C) applying exogenous NO or NO-priming in propagation and postharvest management, and (D) testing under realistic climate stress conditions.

    Table

    Major climate change-related abiotic stress affecting ornamental plants.

    Summary of NO-mediated physiological and molecular responses enhancing stress tolerance, developmental traits, and postharvest performance in ornamental plants.

    Reference

    1. Abbasi J, Asil MH, Olfati J ( 2020) Effects of melatonin and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) spray on salinity adjustment and improving the morpho-physiological traits of cut flower Gerbera jamesonii. Journal of Soil and Plant Interactions 11:29-44
    2. Aftab M, Yousuf Lone H, Wani AA, Zargar MA, Tahir I ( 2024) Exogenous nitric oxide extends longevity in cut Lilium tigrinum flowers by orchestrating biochemical and molecular aspects. Functional Plant Biology 51:FP24202
    3. Ahsan M, Tufail A, Jamal A, Al-Yasi HM, Radicetti E, Raza MA, Bakhsh A, Sajid M, Memon ZN, Valipour M ( 2025) Nitric oxide regulates water status, antioxidant enzymes, nutritional balance, and growth of gazania (Gazania rigens) under drought stress. Functional Plant Biology 52:FP25092
    4. Al Azzawi TN, Khan M, Hussain A, Shahid M, QI Muhammad, Mun BG, Lee SU, Yun BW ( 2020) Evaluation of Iraqi rice cultivars for their tolerance to drought stress. Agronomy 10:1782
    5. Al Azzawi TN, Khan M, Mun BG, Lee SU, Imran M, Hussain A, Rolly NK, Lee DS, Ali S, Lee IJ ( 2023) Enhanced resistance of atnigr1 against pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato suggests negative regulation of plant basal defense and systemic acquired resistance by AtNIGR1 encoding NAD (P)-Binding rossmann- old in Arabidopsis thaliana. Antioxidants 12:989
    6. Alnusairi GS, Mazrou YS, Qari SH, Elkelish AA, Soliman MH, Eweis M, Abdelaal K, El-Samad GA, Ibrahim MF, ElNahhas N ( 2021) Exogenous nitric oxide reinforces photosynthetic efficiency, osmolyte, mineral uptake, antioxidant, expression of stress-responsive genes and ameliorates the effects of salinity stress in wheat. Plants 10:1693
    7. Arasimowicz‐Jelonek M, Floryszak‐Wieczorek J, Kosmala A ( 2011) Are nitric oxide donors a valuable tool to study the functional role of nitric oxide in plant metabolism? Plant Biology 13:747-756
    8. Arun M, Radhakrishnan R, Ai T, Naing A, Lee I, Kim C ( 2016) Nitrogenous compounds enhance the growth of petunia and reprogram biochemical changes against the adverse effect of salinity. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 91:562-572
    9. Aslam R, Wali Q, Sarwar M, Naeem M, Zia M ( 2019) A comprehensive overview of transcription factors (WRKY, NAC and BZIP) in plants. J. Biosci 14:495-509
    10. Bornman JF, Barnes PW, Robson TM, Robinson SA, Jansen MA, Ballaré CL, Flint SD ( 2019) Linkages between stratospheric ozone, UV radiation and climate change and their implications for terrestrial ecosystems. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences 18:681-716
    11. Chen Z, Zhao X, Hu Z, Leng P ( 2019) Nitric oxide modulating ion balance in Hylotelephium erythrostictum roots subjected to NaCl stress based on the analysis of transcriptome, fluorescence, and ion fluxes. Scientific Reports 9:18317
    12. Corpas FJ, González-Gordo S, Palma JM ( 2021) Nitric oxide and hydrogen sulfide modulate the NADPH- enerating enzymatic system in higher plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 72:830-847
    13. Falak N, Imran QM, Hussain A, Yun BW ( 2021) Transcription factors as the “Blitzkrieg” of plant defense: A pragmatic view of nitric oxide’s role in gene regulation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:522
    14. Fan H, Du C, Ding L, Xu Y ( 2014) Exogenous nitric oxide promotes waterlogging tolerance as related to the activities of antioxidant enzymes in cucumber seedlings. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 61:366-373
    15. Fan J, Chen K, Amombo E, Hu Z, Chen L, Fu J ( 2015) Physiological and molecular mechanism of nitric oxide (NO) involved in bermudagrass response to cold stress. Plos One 10: e0132991
    16. Farooq S, Ul Haq A, Lone ML, Waseem W, Parveen S, Altaf F, Tahir I, Alsahli AA ( 2024) “From villain to hero”: Harnessing the gaseous grace of nitric oxide for prolonged elegance in Antirrhinum majus L. cut spikes. Journal of King Saud University 36:103217
    17. Gabaldón C, Gómez Ros LV, Pedreño MA, Ros Barceló A ( 2005) Nitric oxide production by the differentiating xylem of Zinnia elegans. New Phytologist 165:121-130
    18. Hajihashemi S, Jahantigh O ( 2023) Nitric oxide effect on growth, physiological and biochemical processes, flowering, and postharvest performance of narcissus tazzeta. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 42:892- 07
    19. Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Alam MM, Fujita M ( 2012) Exogenous nitric oxide alleviates high temperature induced oxidative stress in wheat (‘Triticum aestivum’ L.) seedlings by modulating the antioxidant defense and glyoxalase system. Australian Journal of Crop Science 6:1314-1323
    20. Hussain A, Mun BG, Imran QM, Lee SU, Adamu TA, Shahid M, Kim KM, Yun BW ( 2016) Nitric oxide mediated transcriptome profiling reveals activation of multiple regulatory pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:975
    21. Jafari M, Daneshvar MH ( 2020) Effects of sodium nitroprusside on indirect shoot organogenesis and in vitro root formation of Tagetes erecta: An important medicinal plant. Polish Journal of Applied Sciences 5:14-19
    22. Karagüzel ÜÖ ( 2025) Blossoms amid drought: A bibliometric mapping of research on drought stress in ornamental. Frontiers in Plant Science 16:1644092
    23. Kaya C, Uğurlar F, Seth CS ( 2024) Sodium nitroprusside modulates oxidative and nitrosative processes in Lycopersicum esculentum L. under drought stress. Plant Cell Reports 43:152
    24. Khan M, Al Azawi TNI, Pande A, Mun BG, Lee DS, Hussain A, Lee BH, Yun BW ( 2021) The role of nitric oxide-induced ATILL6 in growth and disease resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:685156
    25. Khan M, Al Azzawi TNI, Ali S, Yun BW, Mun BG ( 2023) Nitric oxide, a key modulator in the alleviation of environmental stress-mediated damage in crop plants: A meta-analysis. Plants 12:2121
    26. Khan M, Ali S, Al Azzawi TNI, Saqib S, Ullah F, Ayaz A, Zaman W ( 2023) The key roles of ROS and RNS as a signaling molecule in plant-microbe interactions. Antioxidants 12:268
    27. Khan M, Ali S, Al Azzawi TNI, Yun BW ( 2023) Nitric oxide acts as a key signaling molecule in plant development under stressful conditions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24:4782
    28. Khan M, Imran QM, Shahid M, Mun BG, Lee SU, Khan MA, Hussain A, Lee IJ, Yun BW ( 2019) Nitric oxide- induced AtAO3 differentially regulates plant defense and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biology 19:1-19
    29. Liang L, Deng Y, Sun X, Jia X, Su J ( 2018) Exogenous nitric oxide pretreatment enhances chilling tolerance of Anthurium. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 143:3-13
    30. Liao WB, Huang GB, Yu JH, Zhang ML ( 2012) Nitric oxide and hydrogen peroxide alleviate drought stress in marigold explants and promote its adventitious root development. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 58: 6-15
    31. Liao WB, Zhang ML, Yu JH ( 2013) Role of nitric oxide in delaying senescence of cut rose flowers and its interaction with ethylene. Scientia Horticulturae 155: 30-38
    32. Liu Y, Yuan Y, Jiang Z, Jin S ( 2022) Nitric oxide improves salt tolerance of Cyclocarya paliurus by regulating endogenous glutathione level and antioxidant capacity. Plants 11:1157
    33. Liu Z ( 2025) Tolerance and response of ornamental plants to abiotic stress. Horticulture 11:704
    34. Lombardo MC, Lamattina L ( 2018) Abscisic acid and nitric oxide modulate cytoskeleton organization, root hair growth and ectopic hair formation in Arabidopsis. Nitric Oxide 80:89-97
    35. Mircea DM, Boscaiu M, Sestras RE, Sestras AF, Vicente O ( 2024) Abiotic stress tolerance and invasive potential of ornamental plants in the Mediterranean area: Implications for sustainable landscaping. Agronomy 15:52
    36. Mittler R, Zandalinas SI, Fichman Y, Van Breusegem F ( 2022) Reactive oxygen species signalling in plant stress responses. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 23:663-679
    37. Muhammad M, Basit A, Ameen N, Khan A. Wahab A, Nazim M, Waheed A, Rajput VD, Li L ( 2025) Insights into molecular and biochemical approaches of multi-stress responses to horticultural crops. Plant Growth Regulation 1-22
    38. Nabi RBS, Rolly NK, Tayade R, Khan M, Shahid M, Yun BW ( 2021) Enhanced resistance of atbzip62 against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato suggests negative regulation of plant basal defense and systemic acquired resistance by AtbZIP62 transcription factor. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:11541
    39. Naing AH, Lee K, Arun M, Lim KB, Kim CK ( 2017) Characterization of the role of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) involved in long vase life of different carnation cultivars. BMC Plant Biology 17:149
    40. Niyoifasha CJ, Borena BM, Ukob IT, Minh PN, Al Azzawi TNI, Imran M, Ali S, Inthavong A, Mun BG, Lee IJ ( 2023) Alleviation of Hg-, Cr-, Cu-, and Zn-induced heavy metals stress by exogenous sodium nitroprusside in rice plants. Plants 12(6):1299
    41. Pande A, Mun BG, Rahim W, Khan M, Lee DS, Lee GM, Al Azzawi TNI, Hussain A, Kim CK, Yun BW ( 2022) Phytohormonal regulation through protein s-nitrosylation under stress. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:865542
    42. Parankusam S, Adimulam SS, Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Sharma KK ( 2017) Nitric oxide (NO) in plant heat stress tolerance: Current knowledge and perspectives. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:1582
    43. Park SK, Ahn YJ, Hwang YJ, Lim KB ( 2023) Induction of 2n gametes in oriental lily hybrids ‘Medusa’ and ‘Marco Polo’ utilizing N2O Gas. Floser Research Journal 31:274-286
    44. Partap M, Verma V, Thakur M, Bhargava B ( 2023) Designing of future ornamental crops: A biotechnological driven perspective. Horticulture Research 10:192
    45. Perlikowski D, Lechowicz K, Pawłowicz I, Arasimowicz- Jelonek M, Kosmala A ( 2022) Scavenging of nitric oxide up-regulates photosynthesis under drought in Festuca arundinacea and F. glaucescens but reduces their drought tolerance. Scientific Reports 12:6500
    46. Rahim W, Khan M, Al Azzawi TNI, Pande A, Methela NJ, Ali S, Imran M, Lee DS, Lee GM, Mun BG ( 2022) Exogenously applied sodium nitroprusside mitigates lead toxicity in rice by regulating antioxidants and metal stress-related transcripts. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23:9729
    47. Rolly NK, Imran QM, Shahid M, Imran M, Khan M, Lee SU, Hussain A, Lee IJ, Yun BW ( 2020) Drought- induced AtbZIP62 transcription factor regulates drought stress response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 156:384-395
    48. Seyf M, Khalighi A, Mostofi Y, Naderi R ( 2012) Effect of sodium nitroprusside on vase life and postharvest quality of a cut rose cultivar (Rosa hybrida ‘Utopia’). Journal of Agricultural Science 4:174
    49. Shah IH, Manzoor MA, Jinhui W, Li X, Hameed MK, Rehaman A, Li P, Zhang Y, Niu Q, Chang L ( 2024) Comprehensive review: Effects of climate change and greenhouse gases emission relevance to environmental stress on horticultural crops and management. Journal of Environmental Management 351:119978
    50. Simontacchi M, Galatro A, Ramos-Artuso F, Santa-María GE ( 2015) Plant survival in a changing environment: The role of nitric oxide in plant responses to abiotic stress. Frontiers in Plant Science 6:977
    51. Song L, Ding W, Zhao M, Sun B, Zhang L ( 2006) Nitric oxide protects against oxidative stress under heat stress in the calluses from two ecotypes of reed. Plant Science 171:449-458
    52. Sun X, Yuan Z, Wang B, Zheng L, Tan J ( 2023) Nitric oxide synthase (NOS)-dependent nitric oxide generation is involved in putrescine-induced chilling tolerance of Anthurium andraeanum. Scientia Horticulturae 312: 111849
    53. Ul Haq A, Lateef Lone M, Farooq S, Parveen S, Altaf F, Tahir I, Ingo Hefft D, Ahmad A, Ahmad P ( 2021) Nitric oxide effectively orchestrates postharvest flower senescence: A case study of Consolida ajacis. Functional Plant Biology 50:97-107
    54. Wang J, Chen Z, Zhao Y, Leng P, Hu Z ( 2024) Transcriptomic profiling reveals the contribution of Nitric Oxide to maintaining photosynthesis and antioxidant ability in Hylotelephium erythrostictum leaves under salt stress. Plant Stress 12:100471
    55. Wang YH, Li XC, Zhu-Ge Q, Jiang X, Wang WD, Fang WP, Chen X, Li XH ( 2012) Nitric oxide participates in cold-inhibited Camellia sinensis pollen germination and tube growth partly via cGMP in vitro. Plos One 7:e52436
    56. Wei L, Zhang J, Wei S, Wang C, Deng Y, Hu D, Liu H, Gong W, Pan Y, Liao W ( 2022) Nitric oxide alleviates salt stress through protein S-nitrosylation and transcriptional regulation in tomato seedlings. Planta 256:101
    57. Wills R, Pristijono P, Golding J ( 2015) Nitric oxide and postharvest stress of fruits, vegetables and ornamentals. In: Nitric oxide action in abiotic stress responses in plants. Springer, pp 211-238
    58. Wu Q, Lin J, Liu JZ, Wang X, Lim W, Oh M, Park J, Rajashekar C, Whitham SA, Cheng NH ( 2012) Ectopic expression of Arabidopsis glutaredoxin AtGRXS17 enhances thermotolerance in tomato. Plant Biotechnology Journal 10:945-955
    59. Yang N, Wang X, Cotrozzi L, Chen Y, Zheng F ( 2016) Ozone effects on photosynthesis of ornamental species suitable for urban green spaces of China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 20:437-447
    60. Yang W, Sun Y, Chen S, Jiang J, Chen F, Fang W, Liu Z ( 2011) The effect of exogenously applied nitric oxide on photosynthesis and antioxidant activity in heat stressed chrysanthemum. Biologia Plantarum 55:737-740
    61. Zhang S, Liu L, Wu Z, Wang L, Ban Z ( 2023) S-nitrosylation of superoxide dismutase and catalase involved in promotion of fruit resistance to chilling stress: A case study on Ziziphus jujube Mill. Postharvest Biology and Technology 197:112210
    62. Zhang X, Qi S, Liu S, Mu H, Jiang Y ( 2024) Exogenous sodium nitroprusside alleviates drought stress in Lagenaria siceraria. Plants 13:1972
    63. Zhao L, Xuan Y, Zhou S, Wang L, Jiang H ( 2010) Role of nitric oxide in thermotolerance. Plant Signaling & Behavior 5:1423-1424
    64. Zhao MG, Chen L, Zhang LL, Zhang WH ( 2009) Nitric reductase-dependent nitric oxide production is involved in cold acclimation and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 151:755-767
    65. Zhou Y, Wang Y, Xu F, Song C, Yang X, Zhang Z, Yi M, Ma N, Zhou X, He J ( 2022) Small HSPs play an important role in crosstalk between HSF-HSP and ROS pathways in heat stress response through transcriptomic analysis in lilies (Lilium longiflorum). BMC Plant Biology 22:202
    66. Zhu Y, Du M, Jiang X, Huang M, Zhao J ( 2022) Nitric oxide acts as an inhibitor of postharvest senescence in horticultural products. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23:11512
    67. Zulfiqar F, Moosa A, Darras A, Nafees M, Ashraf M, Al-Ashkar I, El Sabagh A, Hancock JT ( 2024) Preharvest application of hydrogen sulfide and nitric oxide improves floral traits and postharvest performance of cut gladiolus inflorescences. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 43:1153-1165
    
    1. SEARCH
    2. Journal Abbreviation : 'Flower Res. J.'
      Frequency : Quarterly
      Doi Prefix : 10.11623/frj.
      ISSN : 1225-5009 (Print) / 2287-772X (Online)
      Year of Launching : 1991
      Publisher : The Korean Society for Floricultural Science
      Indexed/Tracked/Covered By :

    3. Online Submission

      submission.ijfs.org

    4. Template DOWNLOAD

      Original Research
      Articles
      국문 영문
      Review Articles 리뷰
      ★NEWTechnical Reports단보
      New Cultivar
      Introduction
      품종
    5. 논문유사도검사

    6. KSFS

      Korean Society for
      Floricultural Science

    7. Contact Us
      Flower Research Journal

      - Tel: +82-54-820-5472
      - E-mail: kafid@hanmail.net